Author Topic: \"HEDGING\" in a relationship.  (Read 471 times)

Osiris

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2001, 12:03:00 am »
Have to respect my intelligence, experience, and opinions when it comes to making ANY and all decision that affects the family, and be willing to compromise on ANY issue that I am not willing to defer to your judgment.-DP
I have no problem with what you are saying except I can\'t quite fully grasp the last part of the above.
O.K. Let\'s say that the MAN is willing to compromise on ANY issue that you are not willing to defer to his judgment. However, there comes an issues where he feels after submitting it to you that your solution is not in the best interest for the family. You hold the same feelings about his. This particular issues has no compromise within its decision.
Ex: whether to give the baby a flu shot.
Clinical evidence has equal pros and cons. (maybe you can give a better analogy but you get my point)
Only one decision could be made its either yes or no.  Who makes the decision?

Aphrodite64

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2001, 12:19:00 am »
DP--OK, but I still don\'t understand why you tied that into the Animal Rights Stuff or was that just a joke?
I\'m sick today, I guess I\'m just not getting it.

DianaPrince

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2001, 12:47:00 am »
Osiris,
I\'m sorta analytical, so I have a hard time imagining any issue where research wouldn\'t show that a preponderance of the evidence is either pro or con.  And if all else fails(meaning the evidence sorta looks 50/50), I can live with flipping a coin,  or drawing straws, i.e. leave it up to the will of the universe, destiny.

Aphro,
Its ok hon, its not so important. I just used animals rights as an example of something that YOU fully embrace(the same way some women fully embrace traditional gender roles), but you dont consider it \"jealousy\" if/when folks express not feeling the need to embrace animal rights to the degree that you do(the same way some women may not embrace traditional gender roles, but aren\'t necessarily \"jealous\" of the lives of other women who do).

Osiris

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2001, 03:07:00 am »
AND how will the decision be made or WHO will make the decision?

Aphrodite64

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2001, 04:44:00 pm »
DP:  Ohhhhh....well, I wasn\'t implying that EVERYONE is jealous.  But yes, I have sincerely felt envious of stay-at-home mothers, I\'ll admit it.

Renee

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2001, 05:08:00 pm »
A man or woman that cheats   in most cases does not love his/her spouse less IF love is why they married in the first place!  
A person that steps out sexually on the marriage (cheats) it says that the person has sexual issues within themselves they have not controlled yet……many say to see if they still got it going on, mid age crisis,   one night stand, peer pressure,  deviant sex their spouse will never provide, or lack of sex, etc.
Most folks don’t marry for love they marry for the sake of being married to have children in a so called holy union…even the atheist.

Bluvelvet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2001, 05:28:00 pm »
Renee, I could kick myself in the azz for not finishing that RN program! My plan is to work full time as an LPN for one full yr, drop down to part time, and go back to finish my bachelors in nursing. Try to get it done while the boys are still young and adaptable.

mommy2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2001, 06:21:00 pm »
DP I don\'t know if I am actually part of the hedging group because when my husband got laid off I stuck by him no matter what.  So I was with my husband through him having the ability to take care of me lavishesly(if that\'s a word) to having a hard time paying the bills.  I love him so no matter what I will stand by him. Of course I could be reading the hedging concept totally wrong.                    
And I agree with Blu- IF my husband cheated I would forgive him, but if he did it more than once I would be in the workforce as a single mom.

Oh, and DP yes in the burb that I live in pays their teachers very well.  And with each level of education you go the pay goes up.  I think a person with a Ph.D. makes about 55-60K.[This message has been edited by mommy2 (edited 11-30-2001).]

DianaPrince

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #23 on: November 30, 2001, 07:43:00 pm »
Mommy2,  it would be totally ridiculous and unfair for me to suggest hedging against something that a decent well intentioned man had no control over...like being laid off, or getting injured.
Would you have stuck by him if you thought that he had no intention of trying to get back on his feet?  Thats what you hedge against...the development of a negative state of mind, not unforeseen circumstances.  
I\'m a VERY firm believer in loyalty.

DianaPrince

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
\"HEDGING\" in a relationship.
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2001, 07:22:00 pm »
Crown said: quote: Not to be nitpicky, but I am not going to \"respect\" my ladies opinions when it comes to ANY and ALL decision because there are plenty of things that she doesn\'t know JACK about.   Well its important to note that MY exact statement was:
\"1. Have to respect my intelligence, experience, and opinions when it comes to making ANY and all decision that affects the family, and be willing to compromise on ANY issue that I am not willing to defer to your judgment.
Its a given that no one person cant be an expert in EVERY subject...which means that there will be some things on which the woman will be more knowledgeable, and thus better qualified to make the final decision.  Likewise, the man will know more about some things and be better qualified to make the final decision.  
Can you Crown, Osiris, etc. at least accept that?
 quote:WHY?? As I have so \"simply\" said on numerous occasions, \"ANYTHING WITH TWO HEADS IS A FREAK\".   My contention with you has always been regarding your position that when two reasonable/intelligent heads are available, the BETTER one to be the leader is AUTOMATICALLY the MALE one.
 quote:You can ask her, and she will tell you that I consistently ask her for her opinion on MOST things that involve us.  I\'d wanto to made aware of ALL things that involve/affects us both, PRIOR to the making of a decision....that way, I\'m shown the respect of being provided with the OPPORTUNITY for me to give my input.
 quote:DP, all the things you talked about, are EXACTLY what I have CONSISTENTLY been talking about whenever I brought up the topic of SUBMISSION!!!   Sorry, but I dont care if you wrap it up and put a nice pretty bow on it, I still DONT LIKE THAT DAYM WORD, along with all its religiously based biased connotations, implying some supposed intended and given inherent inferiority of females.  Find some other word to use, cause I ain\'t \"SUBMITTING\" to NO body.
 quote:...but she is afraid someone else will take an interest in me, and she KNOWS that she has a goldmine in her backyard.  LOL...no need to be acting all shy and modest like that dude.
 quote:So DP, I guess the only place we differ is on the idea of the man having the ultimate final say.  Yeah, but its a VERY important point of departure.
 quote:And darlin, I will tell you this much, if you are looking for a man with all those other traits, I will tell you that MOST LIKELY, he is going to be just like me, and he will WANT the ability to make the final decision.  Sure they may WANT that ability, heck we all WANT a lot of stuff, but the point is, will he uncompromisingly INSIST or DEMAND to have the final say on any topic HE feels that HE should.
I know a few man who are like I described, and not all of them are uncompromising.
The way I see it, a smart/insightful man who is secure in his manhood, will recognize that, there may/will be occasions when he WANTS to have the final say, but he may need to acquiesce, in order to serve the greater good of his relationship, and he will not feel as if his willingness to acquiesce makes him any less of a man, or makes him whipped.  The same logic goes for a smart/insightful woman.  
Any successful relationship(meaning BOTH people are happy/satisfied) that I have ever know of that involved two CONFIDENT people, functioned as give-and-take, not consistently MALE dominated.
Side note: Btw, I think I\'ve noticed a sort of coping strategy in some successful relationship where the women in such relationships will give props to their man in public(or around company), to suggest that its HE who gets final say in most of the couple\'s major decisions, BUT in reality(behind closed doors), the man is actually very compromising, and will support his woman\'s preference for most of their decisions.
Sort of a tiger in public/teddy bear in private phenomenon for the man, and a teddy bear in public/tiger in private phenomenon for the woman.....it seems to fulfill the primary psychological need of both partners...interesting.
DP